In the SASB risk-management process, which phase is designed to support internal decision-making by integrating SASB metrics into performance dashboards?

In the SASB risk-management process, which phase is designed to support internal decision-making by integrating SASB metrics into performance dashboards?

• A. Monitor
• B. Report
• C. Identify
• D. Assess

Answer: (A)

Monitoring focuses on ongoing oversight, turning SASB metrics into actionable views so management can steer decisions in real time. In this phase, SASB-relevant data is integrated into performance dashboards, providing current status, trends, and early warning signals that support internal decision-making. Managers can compare metrics against targets, spot deviations, and adjust controls or strategies promptly. By contrast, identifying risks is about discovery, assessing is about evaluating severity and likelihood, and reporting centers on communicating results to stakeholders. The dashboard-driven, continuous oversight aspect is the hallmark of the monitoring phase.

Monitoring focuses on ongoing oversight, turning SASB metrics into actionable views so management can steer decisions in real time. In this phase, SASB-relevant data is integrated into performance dashboards, providing current status, trends, and early warning signals that support internal decision-making. Managers can compare metrics against targets, spot deviations, and adjust controls or strategies promptly.

By contrast, identifying risks is about discovery, assessing is about evaluating severity and likelihood, and reporting centers on communicating results to stakeholders. The dashboard-driven, continuous oversight aspect is the hallmark of the monitoring phase.